Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:08:13.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Handling on Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Housing in Tether-Stalls Among Pregnant Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V Pedersen ,
J L Barnett ,
P H Hemsworth ,
E A Newman  and
B Schirmer
V Pedersen*
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute, Department of Population Biology, University of Copenhagen, C/O PFR-NORTH, Hundclevvej 75, 9480 Løkken, Denmark
J L Barnett
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia
P H Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia
E A Newman
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia
B Schirmer
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty-four primiparous pregnant pigs were randomly assigned to three handling treatments: Minimal, Positive and Negative. The pigs were moved individually to indoor concrete-floored partial stalls with neck-tethers, 2 days before handling commenced. Positive (stroking and patting on approach to an experimenter) and Negative (brief electric shock of < Is when failing to withdraw from the outstretched hand of an experimenter) handling was imposed for 3min day-1 and the amount of physical contact between handler and pig was recorded. The Minimal treatment group was subjected to routine husbandry practices only. After 3 weeks of the handling treatments and tether-housing, all pigs were catheterized under full surgical anaesthesia. The pigs were allowed 4 days of recovery before collecting the following data: daytime plasma Cortisol concentration profiles, behavioural responses to a human in an arena test, Cortisol responses to human proximity, Cortisol responses to an A CTH-challenge and immunological responses to an injected mitogen.

In the Positive treatment, the amount of physical contact between pig and handler increased during the course of the experiment, while the amount of physical contact did not change in the Negative treatment. There were no effects of treatment on behavioural responses in the arena test. The average daytime concentration of free plasma Cortisol was lower in the Positive treatment than in the Negative or Minimal treatments. The Positive treatment also showed lower total and free plasma Cortisol concentrations pre- and posthuman proximity when compared with the Negative treatment. No differences were found between treatments in total and free plasma Cortisol concentrations following an ACTH challenge. The immunological response was greater in the Positive treatment compared with the Negative treatment and tended to be greater when compared with the Minimal treatment.

It was concluded that the nature of the human-animal relationship affected the physiological stress responses of pregnant pigs to tether-housing. Indications are that a positive human-animal relationship would obviate some of the negative effects of being kept in tether-stalls by lowering the basal cortisol concentration and by increasing immunological responsiveness.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourhuman-animal relationshipimmunologypigstether housingstress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 137 - 150
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee 1994 Approval of experimental protocol number 1335. Department of Agriculture, Victorian Institute of Animal Science, 29th of March, 2ppGoogle Scholar
Baldi, A, Verga, M, Maffii, M, Canali, E, Chiaraviglio, D and Ferrari, C 1989 Effects of blood sampling procedures, grouping and adrenal stimulation on stress responses in the growing pig. Reproduction and Nutritional Development 29: 95–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, J L, Cronin, G M and Windfield, C G 1981 The effects of individual and group penning on total and free plasma corticosteroids and the maximum corticosteroid binding capacity. Genetics and Comparative Endocrinology 44: 219–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H, Cronin, G M, Newman, E A and McCalIum, T H 1991 Effects of design of individual cage-stalls on the behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H, Cronin, G M, Newman, E A, McCallum, T H and Chilton, D 1992 The effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare related behavioural and physiological responses of group housed pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H, Winfield, C G and Fahy, V A 1987 The effects of pregnancy and parity number on behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare status of individual and group-housed pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L, Winfield, C G, Cronin, G M, Hemsworth, P H and Dewar, A M 1985 The effect of individual and group housing on behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, B A, Ford, J J, Christenson, R K, Manak, R C, Hahn, G L and DeShazer, J A 1985 Cortisol response of gilts in tether stalls. Journal Animal Science 60: 264–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, G IVI 1985 The Development and Significance of Abnormal Stereotyped Behaviours in Tethered Sows. PhD thesis, Agricultural University Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Friend, T H, Dellmeier, G R and Gbur, E E 1985 Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. I. Physiology. Journal of Animal Science 60: 1095–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, T H, Gwazdauskas, F C and Polan, C E 1979 Change in adrenal response from free stall competition. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 768–771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonyou, H W, Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1986 Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1987 Human-animal interactions. In: E O Price (ed) The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice, Volume 3 pp 339–356. Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Coleman, G J 1993 The human-animal relationship in agriculture and its consequences for the animal. Animal Welfare 2: 33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1981 The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids in the juvenile female pig. Hormones and Behavior 15: 396–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1986 The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, L L and Pedersen, V 1991 Effects of whole-year nest boxes on Cortisol, circulating leucocytes, exploration and agonistic behaviour in silver foxes. Behavioral Processes 25: 171–179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladewig, J and Smidt, D 1989 Behaviour, episodic secretion of Cortisol, and adrenocortical reactivity in bulls subjected to tethering. Hormones and Behaviour 23: 344–360CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, A M and Peace, S P 1989 Boar-induced puberty in gilts handled pleasantly or unpleasantly during rearing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, A M and Pearce, G P 1992 Growth, response to humans and corticosteroids in male pigs housed individually and subjected to pleasant, unpleasant or minimal handling during rearing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1993 Effects of different post-weaning handling procedures on the later behaviour of silver foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1994 Long-term effects of different handling procedures on behavioural, physiological, and production-related parameters in silver foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V and Jeppesen, L L 1990 Effects of early handling on later behaviour and stress responses in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 383–393Google Scholar
Rampacek, G B, Kraeling, R R, Fonda, E S and Barb, R C 1984 Comparison of physiological indicators of chronic stress in confined and non-confined gilts. Journal of Animal Science 58: 401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc 1985 SAS Users Guide: Statistics Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D B 1980 Stress and its measurement in domestic animals: A review of behavioral and physiological studies under field and laboratory situations. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 24: 179–210Google ScholarPubMed
Takken, A and Williams, K C 1981 A simplified procedure for long term catheterisation of the anterior vena cava in adult pigs. Australian Veterinary Journal 57: 17–20Google Scholar