Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:47:17.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Translocation on a Social Group of Badgers (Meles Meles)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J A Brown  and
C L Cheeseman
J A Brown*
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey, GU3 3LQ
C L Cheeseman
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey, GU3 3LQ
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A social group of six badgers (Meles meles) (four adults and two cubs) was translocated from urban Bexhill, East Sussex, in August 1993 to a 1216m2 electrified enclosure in a part of Suffolk largely unoccupied by badgers. Three adult badgers (SY2, SY5 and SY6) escaped from the release site prior to the removal of the perimeter fence on 10 December and established a sett near a village, 2.9km from the release site. In January 1994, the remaining adult (SY4) left the release site and moved 1.8km to the grounds of a youth detention centre. The cubs did not desert the site as readily as the adults.

Home-range sizes for two adult females, SY4 and SY6, remained relatively constant, while that of adult male SY2 increased from 50ha in February to nearly 400ha in April. The range of SY2 overlapped parts of the ranges of the two females, although SY4 and SY6's ranges never overlapped.

The percentage volume of scavenged food in the diet increased monthly between February and April which corresponded to increased garden activity over this period. Earthworms were the most important item in the diet. The establishment of both main setts near housing and the preference for foraging in gardens suggests that badgers released into novel environments may search for familiar habitats.

It is concluded that translocation can successfully establish badgers at new locations. However, translocation as a solution to problems caused by badgers must only be viewed as a last resort, not least due to the potential for disease spread.

Keywords

animal welfarebadgerdiethome-range sizerelease sitetranslocation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , August 1996 , pp. 289 - 309
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, J 1955 The food of the Danish badger (Meles meles danica) with special reference to the summer months. Danish Review of Game Biology 3: 1–75Google Scholar
Bradbury, K 1974 The badger’s diet. In: Paget, R J and Middleton, A L V (eds) Badgers of Yorkshire and Humberside pp 113–125. Ebor Press: York, UKGoogle Scholar
Bright, P W and Morris, P A 1994 Animal translocation for conservation: performance of dormice in relation to release methods, origin and season. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, C L, Cresswell, W J, Harris, S and Mallinson, P J 1988 Comparison of dispersal and other movements in two badger (Meles meles) populations. Mammal Review 18: 51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, C L and Harris, S 1982 Methods of marking badgers (Meles meles). Journal of Zoology, London 197: 289–292Google Scholar
Cheeseman, C L and Mallinson, P J 1980 Radio tracking in the study of bovine tuberculosis in badgers. In: Amlaner, C J and Macdonald, D W (eds) A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking pp 649–656. Pergamon Press: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, C L, Mallinson, P J, Ryan, J and Wilesmith, J W 1993 Recolonisation by badgers in Gloucestershire. In: Hayden, T J (ed) The Badger pp 78–93. Royal Irish Academy: Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, P, Harris, S and Jefferies, D J 1990 The History, Distribution, Status and Habitat Requirements of the Badger in Britain. Nature Conservancy Council: Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, W 1992 Releasing badgers - groups or individuals. In: Seminar on Treatment and Rehabilitation of Badgers pp 19–24. Wiltshire Badger Group: UKGoogle Scholar
Dunn, O J 1964 Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6: 241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, J A, Rathbun, G B and VanBlaricom, G R 1993 Paradigms for managing carnivores: the case of the sea otter. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 65: 307–320Google Scholar
Goodger, J, Nolan, A, Russell, W P, Dalley, D J, Thorns, C J, Stuart, F A, Crostan, P and Newell, D G 1994 Serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers: development of an indirect ELISA using a 25 kDa antigen. Veterinary Record 135: 82–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahesy, T, Sleeman, P and Twomey, N 1992 The use of electric fencing to control badger movement. In: Selected Papers pp 7-11. Tuberculosis Investigation Unit, University College Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
Harris, S 1982 Activity patterns and habitat utilization of badgers (Meles meles) in suburban Bristol: a radio tracking study. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 49: 301–323Google Scholar
Harris, S 1984 Ecology of urban badgers Meles meles: distribution in Britain and habitat selection, persecution, food and damage in the city of Bristol. Biological Conservation 28: 349–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S 1989 Taking stock of brock. BBC Wildlife Magazine 7: 460–464Google Scholar
Harris, S 1993 The status of the badger (Meles meles) in Britain, with particular reference to East Anglia. Transactions of the Suffolk Naturalists’ Society 29: 104–112Google Scholar
Harris, S, Jefferies, D, Cheeseman, C and Booty, C 1994 Problems with Badgers ? 3rd revised edition. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Hayes, W L and Winkler, R L 1970 Statistics, Probability, Inference and Decision. Volume 1. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, D J, Wayre, P, Jessop, R M and Mitchell-Jones, A J 1986 Reinforcing the native otter Lutra lutra population in East Anglia: an analysis of the behaviour and range development of the first release group. Mammal Review 16: 65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward, R 1990 Ranges IV. Software for Analysing Animal Location Data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology: Wareham, UKGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H 1978 Spatial organization and territorial behaviour of the European badger Meles meles. Journal of Zoology, London 184: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H and Parish, T 1981 Feeding specialization of the European badger Meles meles in Scotland. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 773–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H and Parish, T 1982 Factors affecting population density, group size and territory size of the European badger, Meles meles. Journal of Zoology, London 196: 31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H, Parish, T, Brown, CAJ and Carrera, J 1979 The use of pasture by the European badger (Meles meles). Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 453–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankester, K, Apeldoorn, R van, Meelis, E and Verboom, J 1991 Management perspectives for populations of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 28: 561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, C O 1947 Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37: 223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D E and Smith, R 1990 The red wolf as a model for carnivore re-introductions. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 62: 263–278Google Scholar
Morris, P A 1993 Rehabilitating sick and injured hedgehogs - does it work? British Wildlife 5: 69–72Google Scholar
Neu, C W, Byers, C R, Peek, J M and Boy, V 1974 A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D G, Stuart, F A, Brewer, J I and Mahmood, K H 1987 Experimental infection of badgers (Meles meles) with Mycobacterium bovis. Epidemiology and Infection 98: 145–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reason, P, Harris, S and Cresswell, P 1993 Estimating the impact of past persecution and habitat changes on the numbers of badgers Meles meles in Britain. Mammal Review 23: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, T J 1992 Badger Meles meles setts - architecture, internal environment and function. Mammal Review 22: 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sempéré, A, Boisaubert, B, Boutin, J M and Arnaud, J 1986 Analyse des variations saisonières de l’utilisation de l’espace chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) introduit en milieux ouverts a faible densité de population. Gibier Faune Sauvage 3: 393–422Google Scholar
Skinner, C A and Skinner, P J 1988 Food of badgers (Meles meles) in an arable area of Essex. Journal of Zoology, London 215: 360–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoog, P 1970 The food of the Swedish badger, (Meles meles L.). Viltrevy 7: 1–120Google Scholar
Southwood, TRE 1966 Ecological Methods, with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Methuen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Tapper, S 1992 Game Heritage: An Ecological Review from Shooting and Gamekeeping Records. Game Conservancy Trust: Fordingbridge, UKGoogle Scholar
White, G C and Garrott, R A 1990 Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Zar, J H 1984 Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall International: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar