Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T20:49:50.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Behaviour and Productivity of Growing Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V E Beattie ,
N Walker  and
I A Sneddon
V E Beattie*
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DR
N Walker
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DR
I A Sneddon
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DR School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, BT7 INN Northern Ireland
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the effects of enriching the environment on the behaviour and productivity of pigs, in an attempt to assess changes in welfare. A total of 102 pigs were housed in either barren or enriched housing from birth to slaughter. The barren environments were defined as intensive housing and the enriched environments incorporated extra space, an area which contained peat and straw in a rack. Enriching the environment reduced both the amount of time pigs spent inactive and the time involved in harmful social and aggressive behaviour. Tail biting was absent from the enriched environment but four pigs were removed from barren pens with severe tail damage. Pigs housed in enriched environments spent longer durations in exploratory behaviour than those in barren housing, and young pigs in enriched environments performed locomotory behaviour more frequently than their counterparts in barren environments. Overall growth rates were similar in both treatments. These results indicate that welfare is improved by enrichment with substrates and suggest that barren pens should be modified to provide these facilities.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourenvironmental enrichmentpigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 207 - 220
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apple, J K and Craig, J V 1992 The influence of pen size on toy preference of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, V E 1994 The Effects of Environmental Enrichment on the Domestic Pig. PhD Thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern IrelandGoogle Scholar
Beattie, V E, Walker, N and Sneddon, I A 1992 Effects of space allowance and environmental enrichment for the domestic pig. Proceedings of the International Society for Applied Ethology, London. Paper no 11 (unpublished)Google Scholar
Beilharz, R G and Cox, D E 1967 Social dominance in swine. Animal Behaviour 15: 117–122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bøe, K E 1992 The effect of different kinds of bedding on the behaviour of fattening pigs. Proceedings from the 84th annual meeting of American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). Paper no 87. American Society of Animal Science: Champaign, USAGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M 1988 The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M 1991 Animal welfare: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167–4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S A 1987 Development of behaviour in piglets. Welfare aspects of piglet rearing. In: D Marx, A Grauvogal and D Smidt (eds) Agriculture Welfare Aspects of Pig Rearing pp 70–80. Commission of the European Communities Report 10776: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, T G and Curtis, S E 1983 Some observations on the role of behaviour in swine production and future research needs. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, I 1992 Effects of environmental enrichment on growing pigs. Animal Production 54: 483Google Scholar
Lawrence, A 1987 Consumer demand theory and the assessment of animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 35: 293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H 1982 Behavioural Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Mendl, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, S K, Evans, S and Chamove, A S 1988 Older offspring contact novel objects soonest in Callitrichid families. Biology of Behaviour 13: 82–96Google Scholar
Morrow, ATS 1993 Studies on Voluntary Feed Intake of Growing Pigs with Reference to Behaviour and Efficiency of Food Utilization. PhD Thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern IrelandGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C, Wood-Gush, D G M and Hall, J W 1988 Playful behaviour of piglets. Behavioural Processes 17: 205–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pear ce, G P and Paterson, A M 1993 The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, A L, Salomons, M O, Tong, AKW, Sather, A P and Lepage, P 1990 The effect of environment enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheel, D E, Graves, H B and Sherritt, G W 1977 Nursing order, social dominance and growth in swine. Journal of Animal Science 45: 219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W G P 1986 Rearing Conditions and Behaviour in Pigs. PhD Thesis, University of Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Signoret, J P 1983 General conclusions. In: D Smidt (ed) Indicators Relevant to Farm Animal Welfare pp 245–247. Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, H B 1990 Behaviour and distribution of fattening pigs in the multi-activity pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Putten, G 1979 Ever been close to a nosey pig? Applied Animal Ethology 5: 298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Putten, G 1981 Restriction of induced behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 387–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM and Beilharz, R G 1983 The enrichment of a bare environment for animals in confined conditions. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar