Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:31:14.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Cotton-Top Tamarins (Saguinus Oedipus) to Faecal Scents of Predators and Non-Predators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

H M Buchanan-Smith ,
D A Anderson  and
C W Ryan
H M Buchanan-Smith*
Affiliation:
Scottish Primate Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU, Scotland, UK
D A Anderson
Affiliation:
Scottish Primate Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU, Scotland, UK
C W Ryan
Affiliation:
Scottish Primate Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU, Scotland, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The responses of 56 cotton-top tamarin monkeys (Saguinus oedipus) to the faecal scent of predators and non-predators were recorded to determine if there was a differential response. Methylene chloride extracts were prepared from the faeces of suspected predators (margay and tayra) and non-predators (capybara and paca) known to co-exist with the tamarins in the wild The faecal extracts were presented to the tamarins on wooden dowels in their enclosures. Untreated dowel and dowel treated with methylene chloride served as controls. The tamarins exhibited high anxiety responses to predator scent compared to non-predator scent which produced low anxiety responses. No sex differences were found but an age difference was apparent: younger individuals were more curious than their elders. The response pattern was observed in captive-born individuals and was not affected by whether or not their parents were wild-caught or captive-born. This indicates that the discrimination of predator and non-predator scents is innate. However, this should not be taken to mean that captive cotton-top tamarins should be re-introduced to the wild without prior predator avoidance training. The implication of this study for animal welfare is that in captive environments where both predator and prey species are kept, it is important that predators, and their faeces, are not situated where prey species can detect their presence through olfaction, because prey species may suffer continual levels of heightened anxiety with possible detrimental effects.

Keywords

animal welfareCallitrichidaecotton-top tamarinsfaecal scentspredators
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 17 - 32
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, S A and Altmann, J 1970 Baboon Ecology. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M 1969 The behavioral repertoire of the stump-tailed macaque. Bibliotheca Primatology 2: 1–273Google Scholar
Boonsta, R, Rodd, F and Carlton, D J 1982 Effect of Blarina brevicauda on trap response of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 438–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, H M 1990 Polyspecific association of two tamarin species, Saguinus labiatus and Saguinus fuscicollis, in Bolivia. American Journal of Primatology 22: 205–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caine, N G 1986 Visual monitoring of threatening objects by captive tamarins (Saguinus labiatus). American Journal of Primatology 10: 1–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caine, N G and Weldon, P J 1989 Responses of red-bellied tamarins (Saguinus labiatus) to fecal scents of predatory and non-predatory neotropical mammals. Biotropica 21: 186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Dominique, P 1977 Ecology and Behaviour of Nocturnal Prosimians. Duckworth: LondonGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D L and Wrangham, R W 1987 Predation. In Smuts, B B, Cheney, D L, Seyfarth, R M, Wrangham, R W and Struhsaker, T T (eds) Primate Societies pp 227–239. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, J and Snowdon, C T 1984 Social development during the first 20 weeks in the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus o. oedipus). Animal Behaviour 32: 432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, G A 1979 The use of time and space by the Panamanian tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi). Folia Primatologica 31: 253–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, L H 1987 Comparative feeding ecology of felids in a neotropical rain forest Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20: 271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, G 1986 Communication by chemical signals. In Mitchell, G and Erwin, J (eds) Comparative Primate Biology; Volume 2A: Behavior, Conservation and Ecology pp 531–580. Liss Inc: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S F 1988 The behaviour and ecology of the buffy-headed marmoset, Callithrix flaviceps (O Thomas, 1903). Unpublished PhD thesis, University College: LondonGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S F and Lopes Ferrari, M A 1990 Predator avoidance behaviour in the buffy-headed marmoset, Callithrix flaviceps. Primates 31: 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S L and Snowdon, C T 1990 Predator recognition in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). American Journal of Primatology 20: 283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P 1977 Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini) Vol 1. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Heymann, E W 1987 A field observation of predation on a moustached tamarin (Saguinus mystax) by an anaconda. International Journal of Primatology 8: 193–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, E W 1990 Reactions of wild tamarins Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fiiscicollis to avian predators. International Journal of Primatology 11: 327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 1981 Red Data Book Vol 1 Mammalia. Morges: SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Izawa, K 1978 A field study of the ecology and behaviour of the black-mantled tamarin (Saguinus nigricollis). Primates 19: 241–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, D G, Beck, B B, Dietz, J M, Dietz, L A, Bailou, J D and Coimbra-Filho, A F 1986 Conservation program for the golden lion tamarin: captive research and management, ecological studies, education strategies, and reintroduction. In Benirschke, K (ed) Primates. The road to self-sustaining populations pp 959–979. Springer Verlag: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, D 1984 The Encyclopaedia of Mammals. Allen and Unwin: LondonGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1986 Measuring Behaviour - an Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Menzel, E W 1965 Responsiveness to objects in free ranging Japanese monkeys. Behaviour 26: 130–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, C R 1980 Headcocking and visual perception in primates. Animal Behaviour 28: 151–159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, S K, Evans, S and Chamove, A S 1988 Older offspring contact novel objects soonest in callitrichid families. Biology of Behavior 13: 82–96Google Scholar
Moynihan, M 1970 Some behavior patterns of Platyrrhine monkeys, II, Saguinus geoffroyi and some other tamarins. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 28: 1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, P F 1978 Aspects of the ecology and social organisation of free-ranging cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and the conservation status of the species. In Kleiman, D G (ed) The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae pp 39–71. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington D CGoogle Scholar
Pook, A G and Pook, G 1982 Polyspecific association between Saguinus labiatus, Callimico goeldii and other primates in north-western Bolivia. Folia Primatologica 38: 196–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, E and McGrew, W C 1990 Cotton-top tamarins in a semi-naturalistic colony. American Journal of Primatology 20: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E C, Feistner, A T C, Carroll, B and Young, J A 1989 Establishment of a freeranging group of cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus at the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust. Dodo, Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 26: 60–69Google Scholar
Rylands, A B 1982 The behaviour and ecology of three species of marmosets and tamarins (Callitrichidae, Primates) in Brazil. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Soini, P 1988 The pygmy marmosets, genus Cebuella. In Mittermeier R A, Rylands AB, Coimbra-Filho A F and Bouchardet Da Fonseca G A (eds) Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates, Volume 2 pp 79–129. World Wildlife Fund: Washington D CGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, D M 1982 Does trap odour influence estimation of population size of the short-tailed vole, Microtus agrestis? Journal of Animal Ecology 51: 375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, T P, Nordstrom, L O and Sullivan, D S 1985a Use of predator odors as repellants to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. I Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus). Journal of Chemical Ecology 11: 903–920CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, T P, Nordstom, L O and Sullivan, D S 1985b Use of predator odors as repellante to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. II Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus). Journal of Chemical Ecology 11: 921–935CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terborgh, J 1983 Five New World Primates: a Study of Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press: Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Walker, E P 1983 Walker’s Animals of the World. The John Hopkins University Press: BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Winer, B J 1962 Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill Book Co: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar