Skip to main content

Comparing Traditional and Distance Formats of a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Course

Buy Article:

$29.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to discover if an online course in psychiatric rehabilitation is as successful as a traditional on-campus course in terms of content delivery and learning outcomes.

Method: A traditional on-campus (n = 25) and an online (n = 17) course were compared at pretest and posttest on a measure entitled ”Psychiatric Vocational Rehabilitation Knowledge and Skills Inventory.” A 4 (Skill) × 3 (Time) within-subjects analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to assess changes in the skills of process, potential, partnership, and career advancement over time.

Results: The results were that scores for both formats significantly increased from Time 1 to Time 2, but one format did not perform significantly better than another. The Psychiatric Vocational Rehabilitation Knowledge and Skills Inventory was found to be a reliable measure.

Conclusion: The study underscores the value of a dedicated psychiatric rehabilitation course in rehabilitation graduate education.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 August 2016

More about this publication?
  • Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education is no longer available to subscribers on Ingenta Connect. Please go to http://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrrrpe to access your online subscription to Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education.
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content