Skip to main content

Color Aerial Photography: Toy or Tool?

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

The resolution and color balance of aerial color photographs has been sufficiently improved that they should be considered for routine resource inventories, but they cannot yet be unhesitatingly recommended. Some soil and geologic units unidentifiable in panchromatic prints can be readly distinguished in color. The greater information content of color photography makes vegetation interpretation easier. Vegetation appears more as a spatial volume than as a surface in color photographs, permitting more effective interpretation in shadows than is possible in black and white. Color photography is more expensive than panchromatic, and more is required in exposure, processing, and selection of proper season. Transparencies are superior to color prints because of better resolution and color balance, but are hard to use in the field.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Staff of the Northwest Hydrology Research Center, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. Agric., Boise, Idaho

Publication date: 01 June 1966

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more