Skip to main content

Open Access Robust-parlamentarisch oder informell-partizipativ? Die Tücken der Entscheidungsfindung in komplexen Verfahren

Download Article:
 Download
(HTML 36.5 kb)
 
or
 Download
(PDF 76.3 kb)
 

This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY licence.

Soll die Entscheidungsfindung über ein Endlager parlamentarisch-repräsentativ oder neuartig-partizipativ erfolgen? Zentral ist, ob und welche Beratungsräume zwischen Entscheidern und Zivilgesellschaft neu entstehen. Die Fortentwicklung des Standortauswahlgesetzes nimmt einen mittleren Weg. Es werden Möglichkeiten für innovative Partizipationsformen eröffnet. Allerdings sind Anträge und Stellungnahmen nur schwache Mitwirkungsrechte, die mit den Erwartungen in potenziellen Standortregionen kontrastieren. Wird keine Balance gefunden, verkommt die neue Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung zum partizipativen Ornament.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: governance; participation; radioactive waste disposal; regulation

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 2017

More about this publication?
  • GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.

    Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.

    GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more