Nomenclatural notes 13. An incorrect neotype designation and provision for a lectotype and an epitype for Helvella fusca
A neotype designation for Helvella fusca proposed in 1997 proves to have been erroneous because an illustration accompanying the original description was overlooked. Such illustrations normally have served as the lectotype when all known specimens of the author's taxon have been
lost. The authors of that neotype designation should instead have designated the illustration as a lectotype and a specimen as an epitype, which is done in this paper. The so-called neotype specimen is now selected as the epitype specimen. A full description, illustrations and remarks about
synonyms and a non-synonym are also provided.
Keywords: INTERNATIONAL CODE OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 11 April 2012
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Recent News about Mycotaxon
- Regional Checklists
- Other Mycotaxon, Ltd. publications
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content