Fertilization by manure: a manor model comparing English demesne and peasant land, c.1300
If peasant land had been only as productive as demesne land at the turn of the fourteenth century, most English peasants would not have been able to make a living, since their holdings were too small. By modelling two hypothetical manors, one based on Midland conditions and one based
on East Anglian conditions, this article argues that peasants' output per arable acre must have been 50 per cent higher on average. This was possible because they had much larger amounts of manure at their disposal with which to fertilize their land. The model is based on estimated stocking
densities for three types of farms, namely cottages, half-virgates and demesnes, as well as live weights of cattle, sheep and pigs. The results support the view that the minimum farm size needed for subsistence was much smaller than has hitherto been held to have been necessary.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 June 2017
- Agricultural History Review is the leading journal for the publication of original research in all aspects of agricultural and rural history. First published in 1953, the Review reflects the diversity of approaches which are possible in rural history. Its editors welcome submissions in any aspect of the history of agriculture, rural society and rural economy over the past millennium. Whilst it is not concerned with current policy debates, it is interested in considering discussions of the historical dimensions of current problems in rural society and food supply. The Review is especially strong in British rural history, but actively seeks submissions in European and American rural history and has no bar on submissions concerning the remainder of the world. It is also the journal of record for book reviews in the discipline.
Agricultural History Review has an international editorial board. The current editors are Professor P. S. Warde, University of Cambridge, UK, who is responsible for articles, and Dr J. E. Morgan, University of Bristol, UK, who serves as editor for book reviews. The Review is fully peer-refereed.
Agricultural History Review is published by the British Agricultural History Society from whom personal subscriptions may be obtained. - Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Receive new issue alert- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content