Phenomenology and the Problem of Animal Minds

Author: James, Simon P.

Source: Environmental Values, Volume 18, Number 1, February 2009 , pp. 33-49(17)

Publisher: White Horse Press

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $25.85 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Attempts to determine whether nonhuman animals have minds are often thought to raise a particular sceptical concern; I call it the problem of animal minds. If there are such things as animal minds, the sceptic reasons, they will be private realms to which we humans do not have direct epistemological access. So how could one ever know for certain that animals are not mindless mechanisms? In this paper I use a phenomenological approach to show that this familiar sceptical problem presupposes an account of our relations with others which is both too individualistic and too 'mentalistic' to shed interpretative light on our relations with animals. I conclude that although inquiries into how animals experience the world raise a host of difficult problems, they do not raise one big problem, the problem of animal minds, which must be solved before any such inquiries can get off the ground.

Keywords: Heidegger; Merleau-Ponty; animals; minds; consciousness; embodiment; phenomenology; solipsism

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.3197/096327109X404735

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page