Author: Hayward, Tim

Source: Environmental Values, Volume 6, Number 1, February 1997 , pp. 49-63(15)

Publisher: White Horse Press

Abstract:

Anthropocentrism can intelligibly be criticised as an ontological error, but attempts to conceive of it as an ethical error are liable to conceptual and practical confusion. After noting the paradox that the clearest instances of overcoming anthropocentrism involve precisely the sort of objectivating knowledge which many ecological critics see as itself archetypically anthropocentric, the article presents the following arguments: there are some ways in which anthropocentrism is not objectionable; the defects associated with anthropocentrism in ethics are better understood as instances of speciesism and human chauvinism; it is unhelpful to call these defects anthropocentrism because there is an ineliminable element of anthropocentrism in any ethic at all; moreover, because the defects do not typically involve a concern with human interests as such, the rhetoric of anti-anthropocentrism is counterproductive in practice.

Keywords: anthropocentrism; human chauvinism; speciesism; environmental ethics

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 1997-02-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Ecology ,  Philosophy
• By this author: Hayward, Tim

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers