Possible Persons and the Problems of Posterity
Author: Grey, William
Source: Environmental Values, Volume 5, Number 2, May 1996 , pp. 161-179(19)
Publisher: White Horse Press
Abstract:The moral status of future persons is problematic. It is often claimed that we should take the interests of the indefinite unborn very seriously, because they have a right to a decent life. It is also claimed (often by the same people) that we should allow unrestricted access to abortion, because the indefinite unborn have no rights. In this paper I argue that these intuitions are not in fact inconsistent. The aim is to provide an account of trans-temporal concern which resolves the prima facie inconsistency between commonly held intuitions about our obligations to future persons. I argue that our intuitions can be reconciled provided that we explicate obligations to the future in terms of impersonal principles subject to retroactive person-affecting constraints.
Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 1996-05-01
- Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
Environmental Values has an impact factor (2011) of 1.372
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites