Skip to main content

Editorial

Buy Article:

$20.47 + tax (Refund Policy)

The quality of articles in this issue has provoked a comment on the process by which journals and their content are rated. Evidence from a recent 'Meet the Editors' session at a major international conference suggests this may be a self-fulfilling outcome in which cogito (I think) may have been lost from Descartes original justification for existence and replaced by sum (I am) leaving us with “I am therefore I am”. Without seeking to challenge the quality of articles published in the Category A journals, it is contended that one cannot automatically dismiss work published in non-Category A journals as of lesser worth. Consideration and evaluation of the content of this issue clearly supports this view underlining the need for scholars to look beyond the highest rated journals for original and important contributions to their discipline.

Keywords: JOURNAL RATINGS; QUALITY

Document Type: Editorial

Publication date: 01 July 2007

More about this publication?
  • From 2022, the home of readable radical research. Focussing on the fields of marketing, branding and customer/consumer behaviour, jcb publishes poems, short stories, opinion pieces and articles with attitude.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About
  • Curation
  • Information for Creators
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content