Comparison of Plate Counts, Petrifilm, Dipslides, and Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence for Monitoring Bacteria in Cooling-Tower Waters
Abstract:Effective bacterial control in cooling-tower systems requires accurate and timely methods to count bacteria. Plate-count methods are difficult to implement on-site, because they are time- and labor-intensive and require sterile techniques. Several field-applicable methods (dipslides, Petrifilm, and adenosine triphosphate [ATP] bioluminescence) were compared with the plate count for two sample matrices—phosphate-buffered saline solution containing a pure culture of Pseudomonas fluorescens and cooling-tower water containing an undefined mixed bacterial culture.
For the pure culture, (1) counts determined on nutrient agar and plate-count agar (PCA) media and expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter were equivalent to those on R2A medium ( p = 1.0 and p = 1.0, respectively); (2) Petrifilm counts were not significantly different from R2A plate counts ( p = 0.99); (3) the dipslide counts were up to 2 log units higher than R2A plate counts, but this discrepancy was not statistically significant ( p = 0.06); and (4) a discernable correlation ( r 2 = 0.67) existed between ATP readings and plate counts.
For cooling-tower water samples ( n = 62), (1) bacterial counts using R2A medium were higher (but not significant; p = 0.63) than nutrient agar and significantly higher than tryptone-glucose yeast extract (TGE; p = 0.03) and PCA ( p < 0.001); (2) Petrifilm counts were significantly lower than nutrient agar or R2A ( p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively), but not statistically different from TGE, PCA, and dipslides ( p = 0.55, p = 0.69, and p = 0.91, respectively); (3) the dipslide method yielded bacteria counts 1 to 3 log units lower than nutrient agar and R2A ( p < 0.001), but was not significantly different from Petrifilm ( p = 0.91), PCA ( p = 1.00) or TGE ( p = 0.07); (4) the differences between dipslides and the other methods became greater with a 6-day incubation time; and (5) the correlation between ATP readings and plate counts varied from system to system, was poor ( r 2 values ranged from <0.01 to 0.47), and the ATP method was not sufficiently sensitive to measure counts below approximately 10 4 CFU/mL.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2009-04-01
More about this publication?
- Water Environment Research® (WER®) publishes peer-reviewed research papers, research notes, state-of-the-art and critical reviews on original, fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality, pollution control, and management. An annual Literature Review provides a review of published books and articles on water quality topics from the previous year. Published as: Sewage Works Journal, 1928 - 1949; Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1950 - 1959; Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 1959 - Oct 1989; Research Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, Nov 1989 - 1991; Water Environment Research, 1992 - present.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- WEF Bookstore
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites