If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Analysis of Mercury in Wastewater by Microwave Digestion Followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Comparison with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods Approved in 40 CFR 136.3

$30.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

As a cost-saving measure, the use of an existing microwave digestion system and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instrument was investigated for the analysis of mercury in domestic wastewater, industry effluent, stormwater, and other aqueous matrices analyzed under the City of Portland's (Oregon) various National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. A formal alternate test procedure application (ATP) study was undertaken to add total mercury to the analyte list for the CEM microwave digestion method ( CEM Corporation, 1992) and for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Washington, D.C.) (U.S. EPA) method 200.8, both approved for NPDES work in 40 CFR 136.3 ( U.S. EPA, 2001a). The ATP was submitted in March 2005, and final approval was received in November 2006.

During the study period and while waiting for approval, all NPDES mercury samples were sent to a contract laboratory for analysis by U.S. EPA method 1631E ( U.S. EPA, 2002). Splits were analyzed in-house by the ATP protocol. For treatment plant wastewater and industrial effluents, the 1631E results averaged approximately one-half of those obtained by the ATP method, with a 1% difference slightly above 1000% (order of magnitude) and several in the 200% to 300% range. Preliminary results were confirmed by further studies that compared the ATP method with the room temperature and the heated, closed-vessel digestion option of U.S. EPA methods 245.7 and 1631E ( U.S. EPA, 2001b, 2002). This research suggests that the room temperature bromine chloride (BrCl) digestion is ill-suited for the determination of total mercury in wastewater and industrial effluents. Because of the probability of committing type II errors—that is, assuming mercury is present in low concentrations when, in fact, it is not—results for these matrices found using the room temperature BrCl digestion should be interpreted with caution. It is suggested that such results might best be considered “bromine chloride extractable” and, as such, should not be used in studies that require accurate estimates of total mercury.
More about this publication?
  • Water Environment Research® (WER®) publishes peer-reviewed research papers, research notes, state-of-the-art and critical reviews on original, fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality, pollution control, and management. An annual Literature Review provides a review of published books and articles on water quality topics from the previous year.

    Published as: Sewage Works Journal, 1928 - 1949; Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1950 - 1959; Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 1959 - Oct 1989; Research Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, Nov 1989 - 1991; Water Environment Research, 1992 - present.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • WEF Bookstore
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more