If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Chromate Removal by an Iron Sorbent: Mechanism and Modeling

$30.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

A solution containing chromate was treated using waste shot-blast fines recovered from surface finishing operations in a cast-iron foundry as a sorbent in batch and fixed-bed modes. Equilibrium experiments for initial chromate concentrations of 5 to 10 ppm produced a pH-adsorption edge that exhibits removal of chromium (Cr) over a broad pH range, with adsorption capacities that compare favorably to those reported for other adsorbents such as activated carbon and commercial iron oxides. Surface complexation modeling of adsorption equilibria suggests the formation of monodentate, inner-sphere complexes with chromate (CrO4 2−) and bichromate (HCrO4 ). Adsorption of Cr(VI) at iron oxy-hydroxide sites appears to be the primary mechanism of chromium removal at neutral pH. At lower pH values (for example, pH 4), reduction to Cr(III) is assumed to contribute to the increasing removal as a function of decrease in pH. There is also evidence to support the formation of Cr(III)–iron (Fe)(III) coprecipitate following Cr(VI) reduction by dissolved Fe(II). Using equilibrium constants for the two surface complexation reactions evaluated from a triple-layer model description of the oxide-water interface, chromate removal in a short fixed bed of fines was simulated using a dual mass-transfer kinetic model. Rate coefficients determined from model calibration of the short column were used to predict experimental breakthrough curves in columns with empty bed contact times (EBCTs) up to four times the short column. For an influent chromium concentration and pH of 5 ppm and 7.0, respectively, a solid-phase loading capacity of 9.5 ± 0.3 mg/g was achieved at exhaustion. Predictive model runs indicate that, for this case, an EBCT of 2.0 to 2.5 minutes is optimum for achieving a target effluent concentration of less than or equal to 0.05 mg/L chromium as Cr(VI).

Keywords: adsorption; chromium; iron sorbent; modeling; oxidation/reduction; surface complexation

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143005X84558

Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • Water Environment Research® (WER®) publishes peer-reviewed research papers, research notes, state-of-the-art and critical reviews on original, fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality, pollution control, and management. An annual Literature Review provides a review of published books and articles on water quality topics from the previous year.

    Published as: Sewage Works Journal, 1928 - 1949; Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1950 - 1959; Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 1959 - Oct 1989; Research Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, Nov 1989 - 1991; Water Environment Research, 1992 - present.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • WEF Bookstore
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more