Skip to main content

WERF Nutrient Challenge – Nutrient Regulations, Treatment Performance, and Sustainability Collide

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


The WERF Nutrient Challenge has developed a series of projects to provide information regarding evolving numeric nutrient criteria, how reliable existing technologies perform to meet treatment objectives, the sustainability impacts of nutrient removal at meeting various treatment levels, and other factors. This paper provides a national perspective on the approaches taken by states and other agencies to set in-stream nutrient criteria and the approach to set discharge limits for treatment plants. The approaches range from implementing EPA's ecoregion criteria to TMDL based load allocations. In some cases an adaptive management approach is used. While these approaches vary nation wide, their implications is often to move to very low nutrient concentrations.

A study of 22 full scale wastewater treatment plants forms the basis for assessing the reliability and variability of nutrient removal plants achieving stringent limits. The results using technology performance statistics show that the averaging period for meeting discharge limits plays a key role in the ability of a plant to meet permit. The performance statistics also indicate the ideal performance that can be expected. Combining this information with nutrient speciation studies, the best achievable performance for nutrient removal can be identified for a specific technology.

Additional facilities and resources are needed to meet increasingly stringent nutrient discharge requirements. The sustainability impacts of the additional treatment is presented in terms of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from operation of the facilities, as required for discharge limits ranging from secondary treatment to limits below conventional treatment capability (requiring reverse osmosis). The evaluation of benefits associated with reduced algal growth potential and increasing GHG emissions, shows that the cost benefit ratio change significantly when the nutrient limits are reduced below < 3 mg N /L total nitrogen and < 0.1 mg P/L total phosphorus. Alternative nutrient management and control strategies could be considered for these lower limits.

Keywords: Greenhouse Gas; Nutrient Regulations; Sustainability; Technology Performance Statistics; Triple Bottom Line

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2011

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more