Skip to main content

Controlling Aeration with Ammonium Sensors

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

The City of Peoria's Beardsley Water Reclamation Facility had a problem. The original ammonium sensors installed with their aeration upgrade weren't working and would have to be sent back to Europe for repair. Also, running the aeration system using only a DO setpoint was using an excessive amount of power to maintain the system Nitrogen requirements. An upgrade of the facility was in the planning stages including adding an additional clarifier and filter to ensure water quality standards. Instead, staff decided to give another instrument manufacturer a try, replacing the original ammonium sensor with the Hach NH4Dsc ammonium probe. The NH4Dsc proved to be reliable, and became the first problem resolved at the Beardsley Plant.

With the sensor performing correctly, staff were able to begin automating the aeration system. The system is designed to control the inlet guide vanes on the blowers to meet a target ammonia value which was user –entered. The sensor is installed in the aeration tank, about a quarter of the length of the tank.After profiling the tank it was determined that at this point in the flow, nitrification was mostly complete, which allow the staff to use a dynamic setpoint of 1.5mg/L NH4−N. The control algorithm used adjusts the blowers every 20 minutes, making the appropriate change to the inlet guide vanes to meet the ammonia setpoint. To ensure adequate mixing energy, 0.7mg/L of dissolved oxygen is used as the minimum operating condition, with a maximum of 2.4 mg/L.

Operating under these parameters, staff found another area of the system which could optimize their energy consumption: the sequence of the blowers. The aeration system has five blowers, two 150hp and three 250hp blowers, and under the original sequence during times of low ammonia concentration a 250hp blower would provide the air and sometimes two 250 hp blowers would be needed during high winter seasonal weekend flows. The staff reconfigured the sequence, beginning with a single 150hp blower, progressing to two 150hp, a 150hp and 250hp, and ending with both 250hp blowers during times of high ammonia concentration, leaving an additional 250 hp blower as a standby in cases of another blower failing.

With these improvements made to the aeration control system, the effects were easy to identify. First was the energy consumption: before the changes between 9,500 and 12,000 kwh/day were consumed; after the changes, between 8,000 and 9,000 kwh/day were consumed for an average savings of approximately 21%. Over the course of a year, this equates to a savings of 90,000. The cost of the sensors was 21,000, which equates to a return on investment of about three months.

After operating the system automatically for some time, another improvement became “clear” — settleability improved and the clarifier effluent remained below 2.0 NTU. Due to the improvement in sludge quality, optimizing of the filter system and continuous measurement of the turbidity of the clarifier weir overflow and combined influent turbidity entering the filters it was clear that the 3,000,000 clarifier and filter upgrade became unnecessary. Recognizing these conditions, the project became an improvement project instead of an upgrade; including several turbidity, TSS, and chlorine analyzers and other control system improvements which continue to improve and optimize plant operations enabling effective lab, and maintenance projects to be proactive instead of reactive maintenance.

Recognizing the value of these improvements, the Arizona Water Association honored the Beardsley plant with the “Large Treatment Plant of the Year” award at the annual conference, and city managers asked staff to implement the same optimization system at the city's Butler Water Reclamation Facility.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2011-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more