And the Winner is … A Comparison of Various Approaches for Developing the Numeric Nutrient Criteria
Authors: Peña-Tijerina, A.J.; Bhattarai, R.P.
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2011: Session 41 through Session 50 , pp. 2605-2619(15)
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
Abstract:More than 13 years after EPA urged the States to develop numeric nutrient criteria, nutrients are still among the top causes of waterbody impairments nationwide. While some States have made incremental progress, our national progress toward controlling nutrients has been disappointing. EPA has suggested several approaches for developing the numeric nutrient criteria – classification; reference condition; mechanistic models; stressor-response; multiple lines of evidence, scientific literature and expert judgment; and watershed-based planning. This paper discusses these and other approaches used by the States, and evaluates advantages, disadvantages, and challenges to implement them.
It is clear that “one size fits all” may not be the best approach, since each waterbody is unique in its characteristics as well as in its response to nutrient loading and control methods. And the winner is … An equitable, adaptive and cooperative approach or a combination of approaches that involve all stakeholders, point and nonpoint sources.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2011-01-01
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites