Skip to main content

Comparison of Different Culturing Methods for Enumeration of E. coli in Thermophilically Digested Biosolids

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Pathogen removal in sludge treatment is an important step. Several Class A processes that utilize thermal treatment to achieve pathogen reduction have observed large increases in indicator bacteria, namely fecal coliform or E. coli, after centrifuge dewatering. In many cases, the densities before dewatering were below the detection limit. One hypothesis to explain this observation is that the bacteria were poorly enumerated after the thermophilic processes, but some were still viable and were able to be recovered after dewatering. Bacteria can be non-culturable based on type of media used and methods used for enumeration. To investigate the non-culturable hypothesisE. coli was enumerated using EPA Method 1680 and other culturing methods using microplates for investigation of non-culturable E. coli. Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on pathogen removal was investigated for two enhanced digestion processes in addition to a conventional mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD) process. The enhanced digestion processes were dual digestion process: Autothermal Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion (ATAD) followed by MAD and acid/gas phase digestion process: Acid Phase Digestion (APD) followed by MAD. This study suggests that EPA Method 1680 could be underestimating E. coli density and a need to develop new culturing methods that are able to enumerate injured microorganisms. ATAD is more effective in pathogen removal when compared to APD. Class A Biosolids requirements was achieved with E. coli density below 3 log10 for only 3.5 d HRT for ATAD-MAD process, with enumeration conducted with all the culturing methods investigated for this study. The better performance of ATAD can be linked to O2 input for this process since both APD and ATAD processes were operated at the same temperature and HRTs. Additional research is necessary for comparing the effect of O2 input and HRT on pathogen removal for ATAD.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2011-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more