Could You Defend Your Connection Charges? A Case Study
Authors: Fries, Gary; Keefer, Kim S.; Monreal, Manny; Vogel, Darren F.
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2011: Session 111 through Session 113 , pp. 7092-7102(11)
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
Abstract:The purpose of this paper is present the analysis used to recommend an up-to-date, user-friendly, defensible and equitable water and wastewater connection fee calculation methodology for Polk County Utilities (PCU) for all non-residential developments and uses. PCU required the calculation methodology to be logical and technically defensible. In choosing the calculation methodology, a balance was struck among the goals of: (1) using readily available and locally appropriate data to project demand; (2) matching actual demand of a project to the connection charge paid; and (3) facilitating administrative implementation of the connection charge.The analysis included reviewing the current methodology, looking at equivalent meter size, considering fixture unit values and/or any combination of the above. As a check, four typical installations were reviewed to determine the effect of implementing a new methodology on the connection charge.
Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 2011-01-01
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites