If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Critical Components of Biofilm Models for Engineering Practice

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

Biofilm models are valuable tools for process engineers despite several uncertainties including the dynamics and rate of biofilm detachment, concentration gradients external to the biofilm surface, and undefined biofilm reactor model calibration protocol. The present investigation serves to (1) evaluate two ad hoc model calibration procedures, (2) systematically evaluate critical biofilm model assumptions and components, and (3) conduct a sensitivity analysis with the aim of identifying parameter subsets for biofilm reactor model calibration. AQUASIM was used to describe submerged-completely mixed combined carbon oxidation and nitrification IFAS and MBBR systems, and tertiary nitrification and denitrification MBBRs. The magnitude of model output dependency on uncertainties in model parameters was determined by means of a sensitivity analysis. The following conclusions were drawn from this work. Ad-hoc expert-based trial and error calibration may have limited applicability as resulting parameters are often not sufficiently general to predict system performance during other periods, even for the same wastewater treatment plant. At both temperatures simulated (T = 20°C and 12°C), each system modeled was sensitive to changes in the biofilm parameter mass transfer boundary layer thickness (LL). Sensitivity of model predictions to kinetic and biofilm parameters is strongly influenced by temperature. A cold temperature local sensitivity analysis provided evidence that biofilm models are sensitive to changes in mass transfer boundary layer thickness (LL), diffusivity coefficient (D), maximum growth rate (μ), and affinity constant (K) for the ratelimiting substrate. No simple recommendations for the more appropriate model calibration methodology can be suggested as sensitivity of model predictions significantly depends on environmental conditions (e.g., temperature) and treatment objectives (e.g., nitrification, denitrification).

Keywords: AQUASIM; biofilm; calibration; design; identifiably; model; nitrogen removal; parameter; wastewater

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864710798158698

Publication date: January 1, 2010

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more