Skip to main content

Considerations for Alternative Supplemental Carbon Sources in Deep Bed Denitrification Filters to Achieve Low Effluent Nutrient Concentrations

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

The City of Baltimore has investigated various alternatives to meet the future effluent total nitrogen goal of 3 mg/L and current stringent total phosphorous limit of 0.2 mg/L at its Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant. The selected technology, deep-bed downflow denitrification filter, allows for both nitrogen reduction and partial solids removal. In an effort to confirm the design criteria, a small-scale filter pilot study was undertaken between January and July, 2009. As a result of comprehensive nutrient reduction initiatives for the Chesapeake Bay watershed, the demand for supplemental carbon sources such as methanol is growing and there has been a great deal of interest in the practicability of utilizing alternative carbon sources. Hence, it was also important to evaluate use of alternative carbon sources in order to (1) establish the carbon requirements specific to each substrate (for design considerations) and (2) evaluate operational conditions. This pilot study was segmented into three phases: methanol (as control), ethanol and MicroC™-glycerin. The results of this study suggest that, under warm temperature periods (∼20°C), the effluent nitrate (NOx-N) concentration of approximately 0.5 mg/L was achieved with all the carbon sources at or below the average nitrate loading rate of 38 lb/1000 ft3/day (0.6 kg/m3/d). Even with higher loading rates, effluent quality did not degrade significantly and remained < 1 mg/L most of the time. Observed COD/NOx-N ratios were ∼5.5 (ethanol) and ∼7.0 (glycerin). Some operational differences were noted between methanol, ethanol and glycerin. Glycerin appeared to promote the growth of an unusual biofilm on all of the piping surfaces with which it came in contact, and had noticeably higher yield that led to an increase in backwash frequency when compared to ethanol. In summary, denitrification performance with both of the tested alternative carbon sources met removal requirements. This testing also confirmed that excess available carbon was needed in the filter effluent to maintain performance.

Keywords: Alternative Carbon Sources; Deep Bed Denitrification Filters (DBDF); Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR); Limit of Technology (LOT); Post Denitrification

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864710798159156

Publication date: 2010-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more