Skip to main content

Odor Classification of Biosolids to Mitigate Nuisances : A Québec Approach

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Odors from biosolids are generally considered to be nuisances, not something that requires regulation for protection of public health and the environment. However, there is evidence that malodors may trigger health effects, and malodors are the most common

trigger of public concerns regarding biosolids land application programs. In Quebec, Canada, the Ministry of Sustainable development, Environment and Parks (MDDEP) developed an odor classification system for biosolids and other fertilizing residuals (FRs) that are applied on farm land. This system was developed from a survey of a diversity of individuals' subjective perceptions of the odors from various FRs in comparison with farm manures.

The Ministry uses the classification scheme in its regulations of biosolids and other FRs. Thus, odors are classified just as are levels of trace elements (metals) and pathogens. Specifically, 38 different types of typical biosolids and FRs are given a default odor designation of O1 (smells less offensive than dairy manure) to O3 (smells more offensive than dairy manure, but less offensive than hog slurry) or “out of category” (more offensive than hog slurry). Increasingly stringent management requirements, such as increased setbacks, are required for each classification from O1 to O2 to O3. “Out of category” biosolids / FRs cannot be land applied without further treatment for odors. The regulatory system allows for land application program managers to have their biosolids or other FRs reclassified based on olfactometry applied to the specific material.

Quebec's regulation of biosolids and FRs odors is unique and has proven effective in reducing odor complaints. It is a simple system, easily understood by practitioners and the public. However, it has led to elimination of land application in the province of some biosolids that were deemed too odorous, and for some biosolids management programs, it has added costs for odor reclassification through olfactometry.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: biosolids; fertilizing residuals; manure; nuisance; odor; olfactometry; sewage sludge

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2010-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more