Conducting “Triple Bottom Line” AnalysisWithout Getting Your Economics Degree
Authors: Blankenship, Linda; Godin, Frank
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2009: Session 51 through Session 60 , pp. 3438-3442(5)
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
Abstract:Many utilities are trying to implement better decision-making processes for selecting the most beneficial capital projects to implement in any given year. Utilities desire to ensure that their capital projects help to advance the utilities' strategic priorities to the greatest extent possible. Further, many utilities are trying to make better capital project decisions providing social and environmental benefits, even in light of increased financial needs and constraints. Incorporating triple bottom line and risk management considerations into decision-making and capital project prioritization processes can be a challenge for many utilities without appropriate resources. Quantifying social and economic benefits for which there are no market prices and that are, in fact, intrinsically non-marketable is extremely difficult. Qualitative approaches can be used as an alternative to help the decision-making process.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2009
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites