Comparing Commercial and Transport CFD Models for Secondary Sedimentation

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

Two types of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models of activated sludge sedimentation were compared: transport models based on estimated or measured zone settling velocities versus multi-phase models based on theoretical derivation of phase slip velocity from estimated particle size. Suspended solids and fluid velocity profiles predicted by two-dimensional models of both rectangular and circular sedimentation tanks were compared to measured solids and velocity profiles for each type. Results indicate that the transport modeling is much better grounded in empirical research and should be preferred for future modeling. Commercial CFD models typically provide only multi-phase models as standard features; however, they can be used to implement transport modeling through user-defined functions. This approach appears to be the most promising one for future research.
More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more