Skip to main content

Localized Treatment for Disinfection By-Products

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


The effectiveness of localized treatment for meeting the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR) is examined. Localized treatment is an approach where only the portion of water in the distribution system that exceeds the DBPR is treated. A pilot plant was installed at a reservoir site at an extremity of the Las Vegas Valley Water District's (LVVWD) distribution system. The pilot plant consisted of two treatment trains: one with air stripping followed by granular activated carbon (GAC)/biologically active carbon (BAC), and the other with only GAC/BAC. It was found that air stripping removed 75-85% of TTHMs and that BAC removed most of the HAA5s. GAC produced varying amounts of TTHM removal based on the number of bed volumes treated. The pilot plant was operated for 12 months to capture seasonal differences in treatment effectiveness.

Simulated distribution system (SDS) testing was conducted on blends of treated and reservoir water. Results for LVVWD water indicated that with a blend of only 25% treated water and 75% reservoir water, TTHM concentrations could be maintained below 80 ug/L, even with a contact time of 7 days after re-chlorination. The SDS testing produced TTHM and HAA5 Formation Potentials that are similar to results using empirical equations developed by the EPA. SDS testing was also conducted on waters from the Regional Water Authority of Connecticut and the City of Phoenix, Arizona.

The results of pilot and SDS testing were used to construct a spreadsheet model for use in estimating DBP removal with treatment and DBP reformation with re-chlorination. The model was linked with the hydraulic model of the LVVWD Distribution System. A cost estimating model was also developed for use with the treatment and reformation model in determining if localized treatment might be a cost effective alternative to treating the entire supply at a centralized location. For this study, it was found that localized treatment and indeed be a viable approach for meeting the Stage 2 DBR requirements.

Keywords: Air Stripping; BAC; Disinfection By-Products; GAC; HAA5s; TTHMs

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2009

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more