When Methanol Addition is Cheaper than Free Wastewater for Denitrification
Abstract:A systematic evaluation of estimated construction and operation costs shows that the use of methanol at the Smithfield Packing Plant near Tar Heel, NC is a more economical carbon source for denitrification than anaerobic lagoon influent. The capital and O&M cost comparison of the two options shows that the methanol addition results in a yearly savings of 317,750 when compared to the anaerobic by-pass option. This difference is primarily due to:
Lower estimated capital costs due to the High-Strength Equalization Basin required with the by-pass option.
Reduced biogas production in the anaerobic lagoon associated with the by-pass option.
Reduced aeration requirements and solids handling costs associated with the methanol addition.
This evaluation illustrates the importance of all operational considerations when selecting a carbon source for denitrification at an industrial facility.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2008-01-01
More about this publication?
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites