Skip to main content


The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


Operating data was collected from a number of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in South-East Queensland and used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions from first principles using an inventory-type approach. Emission factors were based as far as possible on relevant data sourced from either the literature or databases used in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) models. The results were compared with those from a desktop simulation approach for a range of WWTP configurations that formed the basis for an LCA study of the trade-offs between nutrient removal and total environmental burden. The results from the actual operating plants compared well in general terms with those from the desktop study, although some differences in points of detail were highlighted. In either case, significant uncertainties in GHG emission estimates were apparent in respect of so-called “fugitive” emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from WWTP operations since both of these gases are major greenhouse contributors. Additional research will be required in this area in order to improve the accuracy of emissions reporting from the wastewater sector. Notwithstanding these uncertainties, the data suggested that imported electrical power and biosolids treatment/ disposal operations are the largest potential sources of greenhouse gas. Opportunities for significant reductions (approx. 20 to 40%) in total GHG emissions exist with the inclusion primary sedimentation, anaerobic digestion and power generation from biogas in the WWTP flow sheet. Addition of chemicals (with embodied GHG emissions) to supplement nutrient removal does not cancel out this reduction. However, from a global perspective, the LCA study has shown that GHG emissions represent only a minor (indicatively <1%) of the normalised total environmental impacts from WWTP operations. Eutrophication and potential human health or ecotoxicity impacts associated with the disposal of biosolids (particularly due to the metals content) are the dominant impacts. This raises the question of how policy directives and environmental regulations from government can best serve the complex (and potentially competing aims) of minimising local environmental impacts whilst also improving sustainability on the widest possible front.

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more