EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR A GREENFIELD WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY, INCORPORATING CARBON-FOOTPRINT AND SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVES
Abstract:In recent years there has been an exponential rise in concern and interest regarding global warming trends, with the evidence becoming increasingly stronger that climate change is a result of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitted largely by human activity. The GHGs of most concern are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorinated carbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexaflouride (SF6). By far the most common of the GHGs is CO2, but several of the other GHGs have considerably stronger effects on global warming potential relative to their total mass, and at least two of them (CH4 and N2O) are common to wastewater treatment.
Wastewater treatment facilities are not considered to be among the top producers of GHGs from human activity; however, a more holistic view of wastewater management indicates that its impacts on GHG emissions spread into other sectors of GHG production. Because of their engineered nature, wastewater treatment facilities represent significant opportunities to reduce GHG emissions. It follows that when a municipality is planning new wastewater treatment facilities, the evaluation of treatment alternatives needs to consider the relative impacts of those alternatives on GHG emissions. Sustainability principles also need to be incorporated into the evaluation methodology.
This paper presents a case study evaluation of wastewater management alternatives including GHG-emissions and overall “carbon-footprint.” This case study is for a future, greenfield-type wastewater treatment facility in Columbus, Indiana. The evaluation demonstrates how different wastewater management options present differing impacts on GHG emissions and carbon sequestration. Consequently, the impacts of GHG emissions and carbon management need to be part of the wastewater facility planning process.
Using a decision science approach, the evaluation compares potential impacts of wastewater management alternatives for new wastewater treatment facilities (19-mgd design capacity). Five different treatment alternatives were evaluated, with three of those alternatives involving sub-options, for a total of eight treatment scenarios investigated:
This paper summarizes the results of the evaluation and demonstrates how traditional and non-traditional wastewater management options are affected by their impacts on carbon management and their potential for reductions in GHG emissions. It is concluded that the evaluation of the GHG-emission impacts and “carbon footprints” of wastewater treatment can and should be considered when evaluating alternatives for the design and implementation of water reclamation facilities.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2008
More about this publication?
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites