Skip to main content

A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting Model for Biosolids Management Planning

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


Biosolids management planning is subject to an increasing number of constraints and criteria driven by increasing public awareness. Sustainability will be one of them and will be measured, to a large extent, in terms of ‘carbon footprint’ or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The authors have developed a model to estimate equivalent CO2 emissions rate per dry ton that could be of potential use in evaluating the relative benefits of biosolids management practices. The GHG emissions equivalent is not a direct translation of energy consumption as it also includes the embedded energy of chemical inputs, potential for carbon sequestration and offsetting of chemical fertilizers and fugitive methane emissions. The model incorporates some of the calculations and default values that are being developed through the U.N. Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Accord and other tools that evaluate GHG emissions reduction credits for environmental projects.

The process is initiated by entries for the wastewater treatment facility: primary and secondary solids production, percent solids, and energy cost of sidestream treatment. It moves through a series of modules including alternatives for thickening, liquid stabilization, dewatering, cake stabilization, odor control, transport, and final use or containment. Each module generates ‘outputs’ which quantify energy and chemical consumption, sidestream treatment demands, and air volumes for odor control, as well as inputs to the next module in the treatment train. Some modules generate energy offsets, fertilizer offsets, and carbon sequestration. Finally, all inputs and outputs pass through GHG equivalency module to generate a GHG equivalent ‘bottom line’. A large number of default values are needed to complete the modules. These have been entered from literature searches and project experience. They are subject to change from plant-specific factors, local mix of energy sources on the grid, transport distances and other factors. Ultimately, this will be an open-ended project designed to incorporate values from other contributors.

The presentation will include the overall conceptual framework, user interface, default values, and examples of hypothetical projects illustrating sensitivities of GHG emissions to planning decisions.

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more