Skip to main content

Dynamic Simulation is Necessary to Understand Differnces in Design of Biological Nutrient Removal MBR Processes

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

The increasingly stringent quality of effluent and the need to reclaim and reuse water are promoting application of biological nutrient removal (BNR) membrane reactor (MBR) systems. At a given site, selection of a BNR process depends on influent characteristics and effluent quality expected from the treatment plant. Ideally, dynamic influent data should be used for process design. However, in most cases, average wastewater quality and flow is available at the design stage, without a detailed understanding of the dynamic nature of the specific source. This is a limitation in practice that can be addressed, to an extent, by incorporating sufficient safety in the design.

This paper examined the design of BNR-MBR processes using BIOWIN™ process simulation software under average and dynamic wastewater conditions. The intent is to demonstrate the necessity of using dynamic quality to arrive at a proper design, since the actual influent concentrations can vary by orders of magnitude with respect to average values. Regardless, the plant is supposed to produce uniform effluent quality at all times. The MBR processes evaluated, modified UCT (conventional), modified UCT (membrane) and modified Johannesburg, produced different design and operating conditions at steady state simulation compared to dynamic simulation for the same target effluent quality. The dynamic simulation, using actual flows and wastewater quality data, showed significant differences in the process design and process responses, confirming the limitation of using the average wastewater quality for design. Furthermore, the evaluation indicated that modified Johannesburg (MJ) process, where a deoxygenation and denitrification reactor was introduced, to utilize the excess dissolved oxygen (DO) in mixed liquor from the membrane tank, resulted in an economical design for the specific wastewater and effluent criteria considered in this study.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2008-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more