If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) in Southeastern Virginia must comply with a "bubble" annual nutrient discharge limitation for its seven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) which discharge to the James River. Most critical is a limitation of annual total nitrogen (TN) discharges
to no more than 2,720,000 kg/yr (6,000,000 lb/yr). Multi-criteria analysis and risk analysis allowed the HRSD to develop a flexible and robust plan to comply with these nutrient discharge limitations. Multi-criteria analysis allowed HRSD to define the characteristics of ideal nutrient removal
options and to prioritize a variety of options relative to these characteristics and to determine which of the available options are the most desirable. Risk analysis then allowed a diverse portfolio of options to be assembled to accommodate a variety of operating scenarios and to meet a variety
of objectives. The portfolio of options accommodated both typical operating conditions and also unusual operating conditions such as plant construction, facilities being removed from operation for maintenance, and plant upsets. A concept was developed concerning how the portfolio of options
would be used, although this concept will be further refined through use. For HRSD, the plan involved the addition of bioaugmentation and carbon addition facilities to the Nansemond (NP) WWTP and the staged addition of the integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) process to the James
River (JR) WWTP. The VIP WWTP will also continue to be operated to maximize nutrient removal. Chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) at the Boat Harbor (BH) WWTP, flow diversions from the Chesapeake Elizabeth (CE) and NP WWTPs to the Atlantic (AT) WWTP which does not discharge to the
James River, and carbon addition and CEPT at the NP and VIP WWTPs provide contingent options that will be "turned on and turned off", as necessary, to achieve compliance. These options will allow compliance with James River nutrient discharge limitations by the January 1, 2011 deadline, along
with the treatment of flows diverted from the York River (YR) WWTP to accommodate construction at this plant. These options, along with upgrades of the Army Base (AB) and YR WWTPs to limit of treatment (LOT) nutrient removal capabilities, will provide sufficient capability to meet HRSD's James
River nutrient river discharge limitations through the planning period (2026). The cost of unique facilities required to comply with James River discharge limitations by 2011 is estimated at about $20 M in 2006 for plants with a combined design treatment capacity of 679,400 m3/day
(179.5 mg). These results demonstrate the benefit of multi-criteria and risk analysis to develop a robust and cost-effective portfolio of options.
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.