Skip to main content

Can a Moving Bed Bioreactor Reduce Toxicity of Complex Industrial Wastewater?

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

MeadWestvaco Corporation in DeRidder, Louisiana refines crude tall oil (a byproduct of black liquor) to produce a variety of specialty chemicals products. The facility generates approximately 0.46 million gallons per day (mgd) of wastewater that require treatment for total recoverable phenols (TRP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and whole effluent toxicity (WET). Potential plant expansions and modifications may require improvement and/or expansion of the wastewater treatment process, and moving bed bioreactor (MBBR) technology was proposed as part of this expansion. Pilot-scale testing of media from AnoxKaldnes and Hydroxyl Systems was conducted to evaluate the MBBR technology. This study demonstrated that MBBR technology, in spite of its known benefits, is not necessarily a silver bullet for treatment of complex industrial wastewater streams such as this tall oil refinery effluent. The MBBR systems were efficient with respect to removal of easily biodegradable organics (i.e., BOD) and significant fractions of COD and TRP. The removals were insufficient for meeting permit limits of COD, and TRP, and WET. No significant differences were observed between the media provided by the vendors. The reason for the inability of the MBBRs to meet the discharge limit was primarily a function of the composition and concentration of the wastewater rather than an inherent flaw in the MBBR technology. When considering MBBR technology or any other biological treatment technology during a planned plant expansion or process change, it is important to consider the composition and concentration of the wastewater and how that composition will affect the wastewater treatment process. Thus use of MBBR technology is not the appropriate solution to the planned plant expansion. Rather, there is need to use alternative treatment processes in place of the MBBR and/or use MBBR plus additional pre- or post-treatment of the wastewater. Such alternatives are being considered at the plant.

Keywords: IFAS; INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT; INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE; MBBR; MOVING BED BIOREACTOR; PULP AND PAPER; TALL OIL REFINING; TOTAL RECOVERABLE PHENOLS; TOXICITY

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864707786831435

Publication date: October 1, 2007

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2007/00002007/00000019/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more