Skip to main content

Can a Moving Bed Bioreactor Reduce Toxicity of Complex Industrial Wastewater?

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial


MeadWestvaco Corporation in DeRidder, Louisiana refines crude tall oil (a byproduct of black liquor) to produce a variety of specialty chemicals products. The facility generates approximately 0.46 million gallons per day (mgd) of wastewater that require treatment for total recoverable phenols (TRP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and whole effluent toxicity (WET). Potential plant expansions and modifications may require improvement and/or expansion of the wastewater treatment process, and moving bed bioreactor (MBBR) technology was proposed as part of this expansion. Pilot-scale testing of media from AnoxKaldnes and Hydroxyl Systems was conducted to evaluate the MBBR technology. This study demonstrated that MBBR technology, in spite of its known benefits, is not necessarily a silver bullet for treatment of complex industrial wastewater streams such as this tall oil refinery effluent. The MBBR systems were efficient with respect to removal of easily biodegradable organics (i.e., BOD) and significant fractions of COD and TRP. The removals were insufficient for meeting permit limits of COD, and TRP, and WET. No significant differences were observed between the media provided by the vendors. The reason for the inability of the MBBRs to meet the discharge limit was primarily a function of the composition and concentration of the wastewater rather than an inherent flaw in the MBBR technology. When considering MBBR technology or any other biological treatment technology during a planned plant expansion or process change, it is important to consider the composition and concentration of the wastewater and how that composition will affect the wastewater treatment process. Thus use of MBBR technology is not the appropriate solution to the planned plant expansion. Rather, there is need to use alternative treatment processes in place of the MBBR and/or use MBBR plus additional pre- or post-treatment of the wastewater. Such alternatives are being considered at the plant.


Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: 2007-10-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more