Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

New York City's drinking water supply is threatened by the potential development of the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The effectiveness of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems in this drinking water supply watershed is being evaluated during the course of a oneyear field study. Twenty-four on-site systems were designed and installed for individual sites throughout the Catskill/Delaware watershed. Fifteen systems utilize one of three alternative pretreatment technologies: peat filter, sand filter or aerobic treatment unit and were constructed with mounds to receive the treated wastewater. Five systems were constructed with septic tank effluent pumped to mounds while the remaining four systems are conventional systems incorporating septic tanks and leach fields installed in native soils. Samples were collected at five or six points within each treatment system monthly and analyzed for carbon, nutrients, and fecal coliform. A least squared difference (LSD) analysis was used to determine the significances of treatment at the distribution box, the point of collect after pretreatment, but before the leach field, and lysimeter 4, the deepest point of collection in the leach field. The data used in the LSD analysis of lysimeter 4 was first adjusted to remove the affects of dilution as this factor was not consistent across system types. Adjustments for dilution were made using conductivity, a conservative tracer that was collected throughout the study. The LSD analysis of the distribution box data presented evidence that pre-treatment units provide a significant amount of treatment to wastewater. Generally, sand and peat filters treat waste to the same levels, but sand filters removed phosphorus to a greater degree. Aerobic treatment units removed the greatest amounts of total nitrogen, but failed to convert a significant amount of ammonia to nitrate + nitrite. In comparison to both sand and peat filters, aerobic treatment units failed to remove significant amounts of fecal coliform. Dilution affects were found to remain fairly constant throughout raised bed leach fields. In comparison they increased with depth in traditional leach fields. As a result, conventional systems, the only system type installed with a traditional leach field, appeared to have to greatest constituent removal by lysimeter 4. After the lysimeter 4 data had been adjusted for dilution it became apparent that peat and sand systems had the greatest removal rates by lysimeter 4.

Keywords: AEROBIC TREATMENT UNIT; ON-SITE TREATMENT SYSTEM; PEAT FILTER; SAND FILTER; SEPTIC SYSTEM

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864707787452723

Publication date: October 13, 2007

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2007/00002007/00000018/art00031
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more