Skip to main content

Free Content On-site Chlorine Generation Feasibility Study

Download Article:
(PDF 49.9033203125 kb)

Or sign up for a free trial

Gaseous chlorine has been effectively used for disinfection in drinking water and wastewater treatment for decades. While various regulatory programs have placed numerous restrictions on the uses of this chemical due to its hazardous nature, recent focus on the possibility of a terrorist attack at a drinking water or wastewater facility, has underscored the potential hazard this chemical presents. On-site chlorine or sodium hypochlorite generation is a feasible alternative compared to purchased and delivered chlorine. The technology is based on the electrolysis of brine (sodium chloride) solution to produce either variable concentrations of sodium hypochlorite or pure chlorine gas. Three best available technologies that should be considered for this application include: 1) direct electrolysis, producing 0.8% liquid sodium hypochlorite by weight; 2) membrane cell electrolysis, producing 12.5% liquid sodium hypochlorite by weight; and 3) membrane cell electrolysis, producing gaseous chlorine and liquid caustic soda.

A side-by-side comparison of advantages, disadvantages, and costs of each technology was conducted to help utilities determine if the existing gas system should be replaced with an alternative system. An economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost effectiveness of the various chlorine generation alternatives under consideration. Although purchased and delivered gaseous chlorine is still the most prevalent form of chlorination in water treatment systems in the United States, the use of aqueous sodium hypochlorite is increasing due to safety concerns associated with the use, storage, and transportation of chlorine gas. Reduced permitting requirements are also an advantage, particularly for low concentration hypochlorite systems. While safety and permitting considerations are attractive aspects of on-site sodium hypochlorite generation, there are also some unattractive aspects, as well. One consideration is the footprints required to store large amounts of solution. Another is the impact on water quality, which can result in higher total dissolved solids and bromate concentrations in the treated water.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics


Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2007-10-13

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more