Skip to main content

Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 pure cultures, primary clarifier, secondary activated, secondary trickling filter effluent, and creek water samples successfully inhibited qPCR amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets from injured or dead E. coli. In viable pure cultures, it was determined that 7.5 μg/ml of EMA reduced qPCR detection of the 18 hr and 40 hr cultures by approximately 1 log, but a continuous culture showed no difference between treated and untreated qPCR copy numbers at high cell concentration. Amplification of heat killed bacteria decreased from 3 to 6 logs depending on EMA concentration and culture age, while the greatest inhibition was observed in the 5 hr culture using 7.5 μg/ml EMA. Treatment exposure times had little effect on culturable numbers or qPCR copy numbers regardless of culture age and sample type. Media type (LB or mTEC) had no effect on the recovery of treated culturable cells from all culture ages and sample types examined, however all samples, both treated and untreated, were sensitive to incubation temperature (data not shown). In environmental water samples, EMA treatment had little to no effect on the recovery of bacteria on media, however qPCR results were lower in the EMA treated samples indicating a small population of non-viable bacteria that were being amplified in the untreated controls. Viability of E. coli in wastewater samples using qPCR was similar to pure culture results suggesting that the addition of EMA treatment to the pre-extraction procedure could easily be incorporated into qPCR assays for bacteria. The drawbacks of this compound are the high cost, the short shelf life and the impact of culture or cell density in environmental samples; however the benefits of rapid and accurate measurement of pathogenic bacteria as well as the potential to optimize biological treatment of wastewaters offset these disadvantages.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2007-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more