Skip to main content

Comparison of Odor Impacts from a Wastewater Treatment Plant Using the ISCST3 and AERMOD Dispersion Models

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved the AERMOD dispersion model for use in demonstrating compliance with ambient air quality standards. This model replaces the Industrial Source Complex – Short Term model, Version 3 (ISCST3). The ISCST3 model has been the primary model used to estimate odor impacts from wastewater treatment plants. While the AERMOD model is described as being a new and improved model relative to the ISCST3 model, the predicted results for AERMOD may be higher than those predicted by ISCST3. The AERMOD dispersion model has not been used in odor impact assessments.

The AERMOD model represents a significant improvement in the way a dispersion model characterizes the surface layer where most of the anthropogenic emissions occur. The AERMOD model also incorporates improved algorithms for the treatment of building cavity and wake effects and plume dispersion in terrain greater than the stack top elevation.

This paper compares the predicted odor impacts from a Cincinnati wastewater treatment plant using the ISCST3 model to those predicted using AERMOD. The approach uses AERMOD to predict odor concentrations to determine whether the odor sources of primary concern and odor control recommendations are the same as those determined using the ISCST3 model. If the predicted odor impacts are significantly different for various classes of sources (point sources verses areas sources), a different odor control strategy may have been implemented. Further, the odor impacts from sources influenced by building cavity and wake effects or impacting elevated terrain features are examined to assess how the AERMOD characterized odor impacts from these sources. Odor impacts from open basins and lagoons will also be examined to assess how odor impacts from these sources differ from those predicted using ISCST3.

The goal was to determine whether the odor control measures adopted at the plant based on the results of the ISCST3 model would have changed if the AERMOD model was used instead. If the odor impacts predicted by AERMOD were different from ISCST3, the factors contributing to this deviation were evaluated.


Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: 2007-10-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more