Skip to main content

Implementing Multi-faceted Strategies for Phased TMAL at Cherry Creek Reservoir, Colorado

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Cherry Creek Reservoir was constructed in 1950 to protect the Denver area from floods. It soon proved to be popular for recreation, and became the heart of Colorado's first State Park. In the 1980s, phosphorous was identified as a limiting factor for algae growth in the reservoir with the potential for negative impacts to beneficial uses, and the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority (Authority) was formed as a local management agency. The Cherry Creek Reservoir has a chlorophyll a standard of 15 μ g/L, which was adopted to protect the reservoir from eutrophication. The reservoir also has a phosphorus goal and a total maximum annual phosphorus load (TMAL) established to maintain the chlorophyll a standard, which is being implemented as a phased TMAL. The phased TMAL provides for the implementation of point and nonpoint source requirements and controls while concurrent required investigations are implemented, as stated in the reservoir Control Regulation, "to better define hydrology, phosphorus sources, chemical processes, and relative loads to the watershed and reservoir." The reservoir has met the TMAL in 14 of the past 15 years, but the reservoir has only met the chlorophyll a standard in 4 of the past 15 years. The wastewater treatment facilities in the watershed already achieve a high level of phosphorus treatment (i. e., effluent phosphorus concentrations of 0.05 mg/L), and the Authority has developed and implemented a multi-faceted approach for watershed management strategies. The activities in this watershed are unique in that they have been implemented and monitored for over 15 years, and the Authority and participating entities continue to identify new strategies to address issues associated with the continued urbanization in the watershed. The Authority's phased TMAL strategies provide others with multiple examples of on-the-ground projects, the benefits and obstacles of working collaboratively with multiple land use agencies and special districts, and long-term monitoring results.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics


Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 October 2007

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more