THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW YORK CITY BNR PROGRAM
Authors: Mahoney, Keith; Mazzocco, Jessica; Mueller, James G.; Paradis, Elio; Bradley, Norman S.; Cooney, Thomas F.; Dailey, Sarah V.; Pitt, Paul A.; Dailey, Sarah
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Nutrient Removal 2007 , pp. 695-718(24)
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
Abstract:
The Long Island Sound Study (LISS), a partnership between the United States Environmental Protection Agency, New York, and Connecticut, was formed by Congress to address water quality concerns related to eutrophication and hypoxia. Nitrogen was identified as the causal agent for the observed water quality problems, and a set of phased Nitrogen removal targets were implemented to reduce discharges to the Sound by more than 50 % over a 15-year period of time. Over the course of those 15 years, the nitrogen reductions will “step-down” so that a phased adaptive management approach is taken to achieve the long-term nitrogen removal goals, with a 23% reduction from 1990 levels after 5 years (16 mg/L TN based on 2005 flow), a 44% reduction after 10 years (12 mg/L TN based on 2005 flow) and the full 50% reduction in 15 years (8.5 mg/L TN based on 2005 flow).The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) has four wastewater pollution control plants (WPCPs) that discharge to the Upper East River, and ultimately, Long Island Sound: Hunts Point, Tallman Island, Bowery Bay, and Wards Island, with a combined secondary treatment capacity of over 700 mgd. Step-Feed Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) was identified as the most feasible technology for implementation at the large scale WPCPs to achieve the necessary Nitrogen removal. To assist in the development of BNR designs and the management of these simultaneous upgrades, the Department formed the Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) Team, to provide design and program management expertise. The AWT Team has assisted NYCDEP in meeting Consent Order milestones, development of BNR facility plans, production of site specific BNR design guidelines, review of BNR design drawings and specifications, and the development of programmatic guidance for design engineers at each of the four WPCPs.BNR guidance was developed by the NYCDEP and AWT Team (NYC/AWT) to ensure that a common approach was followed by the large number of consulting firms, as well as the Department itself, over the duration of the project. Major elements of the BNR upgrades detailed in the guidance include:<list list-type="bullet"> <list-item>Aeration System Upgrades - Provides new blowers and an enhanced process air distribution system to ensure better nitrification</list-item> <list-item>Upgrades to Aeration Tanks - Baffle walls to separate oxic and anoxic zones to allow nitrification/denitrification to occur with flexibility of zone, 1/6, 1/3, etc. down each pass</list-item> <list-item>Froth Control Systems - Reduces the population of foam-producing bacteria</list-item> <list-item>Alkalinity Addition Systems - Provides alkalinity required for nitrification and pH maintenance</list-item> <list-item>Return Activated Sludge Upgrades - Allows Aeration Tanks to carry a higher solids inventory</list-item> <list-item>Separate Centrate Treatment - Provides a dedicated aeration volume to nitrify ammonia-rich centrate</list-item> <list-item>Improved Flow Splitting and Control - To optimize Nitrogen removal</list-item> <list-item>Carbon Addition - Provides additional carbon in the form of methanol to assist in denitrification</list-item> </list>Guidance provided specific details on many other aspects of this program and allowed for seamless coordination between the NYCDEP and its consultant teams.The NYCDEP faced challenges in scheduling and coordinating multiple major capital construction projects, meeting Consent Order construction completion mandates, and simultaneously meeting interim Nitrogen discharge limits. As a tool to assist NYCDEP, the AWT/DEP Team calculated the flows and loads to each WPCP based on population and employment projections and predicted treatment performance before, during, and after construction using the BioWin process model. The BioWin modeling included treatment limitations, such as reactors taken offline for construction, as well as treatment enhancement as the Nitrogen upgrades were placed online and ultimately included carbon addition. The specifics of the modeling results will be presented.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864707787977118
Publication date: 2007-01-01
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Earth and Environmental Sciences , General & Civil Engineering , Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering
- By this author: Mahoney, Keith ; Mazzocco, Jessica ; Mueller, James G. ; Paradis, Elio ; Bradley, Norman S. ; Cooney, Thomas F. ; Dailey, Sarah V. ; Pitt, Paul A. ; Dailey, Sarah

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions