Skip to main content

Choosing Right Methods for the Chlorine Disinfections to Meet Daily E. coli limit in a Large Nitrification Plant

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


Indiana is one of a few states that has replaced a weekly Fecal limit with a daily E. coli limit as an indicator organism for wastewater disinfection. It has been accepted that E. coli is a better organism indicator. However, there is still not an EPA approved method for enumerating E. coli in wastewater. Indiana has adopted several different methods for use by wastewater treatment plants for effluent monitoring. These different E. coli methods might have an impact on the disinfection process performance and efficiency. In addition, for the nitrification plant there will be a challenge for them to meet the daily limit because of the low effluent ammonia and the possible interference of the organic nitrogen. In this study, a full-scale test was designed and performed at a large nitrification plant to compare the impact of three E. coli methods, i.e., Colilert®, m-TEC and modified m-TEC, on the disinfection process performance and efficiency. In addition, an ORP online analyzer was installed side by side with the total chlorine residual analyzer to investigate the correlations between the process performance and ORP and other chlorine control parameters. The results demonstrate that the Colilert® method yields a higher E. coli density compared to the m-TEC methods. The enumeration difference of these methods was found to be much larger for the effluent E. coli density than for the inflow E. coli density. It was difficult to meet the daily E. coli limits using the Colilert® method. The E. coli results of m-TEC method and the modified m-TEC method are significantly correlated. They can be exchangeable without significant impact on the results. ORP was identified as the most significant factor correlated to both the effluent E. coli and the E. coli removal rate, which indicates the ORP is the promising chlorine control parameter for achieving the daily limit goal. Finally, Fecal coliform counts were compared to the E. coli data determined by the Colilert® method and the m-TEC method. It was found the m-TEC enumeration results have a much stronger relationship with the Fecal coliform counts than the Colilert® results. The ratio of the m-TEC E. coli counts to the Fecal coliform counts is about 0.5.

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more