Skip to main content

Comparison of Biofouling Control in a Membrane Bioreactor via Two Coarse Bubble Aeration Cycles

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial


In the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process, coarse bubble aeration is used to scour the surface of the membranes to help control biofouling. Energy required for coarse bubble aeration represents a significant fraction of the total power demand for these systems. To reduce this demand, MBR systems manufactured by Zenon Environmental Inc. operate with cyclic aeration, using a cycle of 10 seconds on and 10 seconds off (10/10 aeration cycle). The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential to reduce power requirements for a full-scale Zenon MBR facility that is currently under construction by application of an alternative aeration cycle. The alternative cycle consists of 10 seconds on and 30 seconds off (10/30 aeration cycle), which reduces scouring air requirements by 50% from the 10/10 cycle. To achieve this objective, a pilot-scale evaluation using an existing 30-gallon per minute MBR plant was conducted. The specific goal of the evaluation was to compare the ability of the 10/10 and 10/30 cycles to control biofouling while operating over a range of flux values. In addition to the pilot-scale testing, an estimate of anticipated power costs savings resulting from implementation of the 10/30 cycle was determined for the full-scale facility. Key findings include: (1) While operating with the 10/10 cycle at a flux of 12 gallons/ft2-d (gfd) over a period of two months, there was no measurable fouling observed. The fouling rates at 15 and 18 gfd were approximately 0.1 and 0.3 psi/day, respectively; (2) While operating with the 10/30 cycle at 12 gfd, a relatively significant amount of fouling was observed after only 14 days of operation, indicating that long operating periods could not be sustained between membrane cleanings; (3) 10/30 cycle fouling, at a flux of 12 gfd, was significantly reduced by modifying the permeate production cycle of the system from 12 minutes permeation/30 seconds relaxation to 12 minutes/45 seconds. As a result of this modification, it was estimated that the system could be operated for 17 months before the membranes would need to be cleaned; (4) 10/30 cycle fouling rates at fluxes of 15 and 18 gfd were approximately 1.1 psi/day and 9.4 psi/day, respectively. These rates are significantly higher than what was observed while operating with the 10/10 cycle; (5) It was estimated that implementation of the 10/30 cycle would result in an approximate 20% reduction of the total power requirements, and thus costs, for the full-scale MBR facility.

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more