Skip to main content

Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

TMDL allocation is central to the overall TMDL process because it creates a technically feasible and reasonably fair division of the allowable load among sources. An innovative approach for TMDL allocation and implementation is the watershed-based pollutant trading. Given the inherent scientific uncertainty for the tradeoffs between point and nonpoint sources, setting of trading ratios can be a contentious issue and was already listed as an obstacle by several pollutant trading programs. One of the fundamental reasons that a trading ratio is often set higher (e.g. greater than 2) is to allow for uncertainty in the level of control needed to attain water quality standards, and to provide a buffer in case traded reductions are less effective than expected. Another reason is to account for differences in the impact of a pollutant in different locations. However, most of available studies did not provide an approach to explicitly address the determination of trading ratio. Instead, subjective selection based on project need and previous literature is often employed in selecting trading ratio within a pre-specified range. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis has rarely been linked to determination of trading ratio.

This paper presents a practical methodology in estimating “equivalent trading ratio” and links uncertainty analysis with trading ratio determination from TMDL allocation process. Determination of ETR can provide a preliminary evaluation of “tradeoffs” between various combination of point and nonpoint source control strategies on ambient water quality improvement. Furthermore, there may be many combinations of point and nonpoint source load allocations that can meet the water quality standard. Greater portion of NPS load reduction in overall TMDL load reduction generally correlates with greater uncertainty and thus requires greater trading ratio. By further incorporating economic consideration (e.g. marginal cost for treatment), it will enhance the scientific basis and thus public perception with the determination of trading ratio for more informed decision in overall TMDL-based pollutant trading program.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864706783751528

Publication date: 2006-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more