Skip to main content

IS ULTRAFILTRATION BETTER THAN MICROFILTRATION AS PRETREATMENT FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS? – PILOT SCALE RESULTS

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

Granular-media filtered secondary effluent from a full-scale plant was subsequently treated at pilot-plant scale by combinations of low- and high pressure membranes. The feed water was split between microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) modules; ferric chloride (4 mg/L) was added to the UF feedwater. Filtrate from each of these became the feed water to three different types of high-pressure membranes operating in parallel, two reverse osmosis (RO) units and one nanofiltration (NF) unit; no chemicals (e.g., chlorine) were added ahead of the high-pressure membranes to control biofouling. Both the low- and high pressure membrane systems were operated at constant flux such that fouling was measured by an increase in transmembrane pressure (TMP). Rejection efficiency was measured by total organic carbon (TOC), selected inorganic parameters, particle counts, turbidity and a virus challenge study. Specific flux was higher and the average TMP was lower for the UF system than the MF system. The fouling rate of two of the three types of high-pressure membranes, as measured by the initial specific flux after cleaning and by the subsequent decline in specific flux, was lower for pretreatment by UF than by MF. Membrane polymer chemistry could possibly explain why the choice of pretreatment did not affect the fouling rate of one of three high-pressure membranes. The choice of membrane pretreatment did not affect rejection efficiency of any of the three high-pressure membranes.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864705783866108

Publication date: January 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2005/00002005/00000012/art00016
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more