COMPARISON OF MBR FACILITY DESIGN PROCESSES

Authors: Jalla, Srinivas; Daily, John; Fry, Don

Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2005: Session 51 through Session 60 , pp. 4211-4224(14)

Publisher: Water Environment Federation

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Rapid urbanization, population growth, and finite water resources coupled with limited assimilative capacity of the receiving waters have prompted many communities to consider innovative technologies for converting wastewater to reusable water. Over the last decade, membrane bio-reactor (MBR) based treatment technology has emerged as a viable alternative to meet this growing demand. The MBR technology couples membrane filters (microfiltration or ultrafiltration) with an activated sludge biological treatment process to eliminate the need for a combination of clarifiers and tertiary filters for separation of high quality effluent from the mixed liquor solids. The MBR technology also eliminates the sludge settleability concerns and although unacknowledged by many regulatory agencies, MBR facilities provide a higher degree of bacteria and virus removal than conventional treatment technologies before any post-treatment disinfection processes. Major benefits of this technology are the elimination of major structures for clarification and filtration, operation at higher MLSS concentrations to downsize reactor sizes or decrease waste sludge quantities, significant reduction in microbial contamination, and reliable production of a high quality effluent.

Recognizing the relevance of MBR technology to water quality and supply sustainability issues, this study compares the design practices and procedures applied to nine MBR facilities (see Table - 1) that are currently in operation and/or final stages of construction for communities in the metro Atlanta area and industries in other locations. Design parameters compared include effluent quality, reactor volumes, MLSS concentrations, flux, sludge age, and membrane life. In addition to summarizing the preliminary results of this study, this paper examines the changing role of the membrane vendor in design of MBR facilities based on membrane procurement procedures followed at these facilities.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864705783866694

Publication date: January 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page