A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO-STAGE THERMOPHILIC, SINGLE STAGE MESOPHILIC, AND TEMPERATURE PHASED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Authors: Inman, David C.; Murthy, Sudhir; Schafer, Perry; Schlegal, Paul; Webb, Jared; Novak, John T.

Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Residuals and Biosolids Management 2005 , pp. 805-818(14)

Publisher: Water Environment Federation

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Blue Plains WWTP is planning to construct an egg shaped digester facility scheduled for completion in 2011. Designers are currently assessing process options for the digesters. To aid in the design, Virginia Tech is conducting a study to compare the performance of lab scale digesters operated as temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) systems, single stage thermophilic, and single stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion systems. Temperature phased anaerobic digestion is the desired process option for the facility due to its higher performance and ability to control product odor.

The digester set up for this study was selected to compare a TPAD system, a two-stage thermophilic system, and two mesophilic conventional digesters using the same feedstock. The digesters were fed a blend of thickened primary and waste activated sludges from Blue Plains, mixed at a 50/50 ratio by weight. The total solids (TS) concentration of the feed was around 4% until each digester achieved stable operating conditions. The study included a short-term increase in loading and a decrease in the hydraulic detention time to simulate peak loading conditions.

Results from the study demonstrated an advantage in favor of the TPAD system. The volatile solids reduction (VSR) was significantly higher (67%) and there was less fluctuation in VSR and volatile fatty acids (VFA) under the peak loading condition. Furthermore, problems associated with ammonia toxicity may be lessened in a second stage mesophilic versus a second stage thermophilic digester. Though not presented in this manuscript, total headspace sulfur odors were also lower in the TPAD digestion system versus the others systems.

Based on the results of this study and other studies in this laboratory, it is recommended that DCWASA continue to pursue TPAD as a process option for Blue Plains' new anaerobic digestion facility.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864705783968015

Publication date: 2005-01-01

More about this publication?

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
Subscribe to this Title
Membership Information
About WEF Proceedings
WEFTEC Conference Information
ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO-STAGE THERMOPHILIC, SINGLE STAGE MESOPHILIC, AND TEMPERATURE PHASED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Buy & download fulltext article:

Tools

Key

Text size:

Useful pages