If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

Class A biosolids processes are perceived to be more expensive than traditional Class B processes. This perception is not always true. The City of Three Rivers, Michigan chained together two Class A biosolids processes: a 2nd generation autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) and an indirectly heated batch dryer to lower construction and operating costs, provide more reliable operation and add process flexibility.

The 2.75 mgd City of Three Rivers WWTP was beset by numerous problems, including organic overloading, septage receiving, failing anaerobic digesters and tremendous odor problems. Sludge drying was selected to replace anaerobic digestion, due to the small volume of end product and a potential local market for dried biosolids. Potential problems were odors, lack of redundant units and staffing for continuous dryer “campaigns”. Additional research and analysis indicated that biosolids stabilization before drying would allow the use of a smaller, much less expensive batch dryer and eliminate the need for redundant units. The most cost effective stabilization process in this “Dual A” concept was a 2nd generation ATAD. It emits no odorous reduced sulfur compounds, produces VS reduction in excess of 60% and could be placed in two existing sludge-holding tanks and a garage. The dryer is an indirectly-heated batch dryer that automatically loads and unloads, is much less expensive than other dryers and can be operated daily and shut down.

The “Dual A” design produces three types of Class A biosolids: 1) liquid biosolids from the ATAD, 2) dewatered cake, and 3) dried biosolids. This flexibility eliminates the need for redundant dewatering and drying, reduces greatly the equipment, and operating costs.

The process was put on-line on schedule and with a few problems noted in this paper. The ATAD feed flow has been greater than design and the feed solids far below the design value. Despite this, the ATAD has maintained thermophilic temperatures, provides almost 50% TS reduction and an easily dewatered sludge at a reasonable polymer dose. The ATAD has been trouble-free. The ATAD enables the plant to accept septage and generates 125,000/yr of added revenue. The dryer has continual small problems but operates at higher than anticipated thermal efficiency and produces a non-dusty, large particle size, dried biosolid.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864705783967638

Publication date: January 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more