Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Wastewater treatment plants perform an important social function in recycling wastewater solids. Beneficial reuse of these wastes through land application occurs on farms, forests, tree farms, and mine reclamation sites. Additionally, these wastes can be disposed of in landfills and incinerators however these options are less directly helpful to society. Despite the fact that land application of biosolids in beneficial reuse projects is an accepted practice and is in fact the backbone of many biosolids programs in North America, this process is still scrutinized when nuisance odors occur. The wastewater industry has usually taken a reactive approach to biosolids odors, reacting to complaints in the field and doing damage control for complaints received. Research in recent years has led to findings showing that several process parameters at the wastewater treatment plant can have a dramatic affect on the odor quality of the biosolids product. In this paper we present several statistical models that predict biosolids odor levels based on processing and management variables as well as ambient conditions. These models offer biosolids managers a tool to act proactively and predict when odorous materials will be produced at the plant. This information, combined with GIS data for receiving areas offers an opportunity to ensure that biosolids of a certain odor profile are matched with a site suitable to accept the odors without adversely impacting the neighboring communities. We illustrate the usefulness of these models via several realistic scenarios that simulate what the odor impact might be. Results of this study include calibrated models using existing process data and field odor data collected by inspectors for one year. Additionally, this study shows how small changes in process parameters can show dramatic changes in odor quality, and that two small changes, while individually may show minor changes in odor, when combined together can have a much larger effect. The model is run for three scenarios that combine different process changes and compares results to the results of the model using average process data.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 2004

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more