Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Polarized air ionizers produce positively and negatively charged oxygen molecules, or ions, with no ozone generated. The ionized air effectively oxidizes most air contaminants including hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and other organic gases. This Swiss technology (Bentax-Air-Tec) has been successfully applied at wastewater facilities in Europe for twenty years. In addition to providing odor control and a safe work environment, air ionization prevents corrosion of electronics and equipment. Systems employing this technology have now been applied by Trans-Tech at many installations in the United States, and performance information has been obtained from some of these full-scale operations.

Small portable ionizer modules can be installed as self contained recirculation units complete with fan. Alternately, the modules can be installed in ductwork on the fresh air supply side of an existing ventilation system. Each duct mounted model 50F5 ionizer is 64 × 22 × 21 cm (25 × 8.8 × 8.4 in) and weighs only 7.3 kg (16 lb.) The number of modules required depends on both the volume of air treated and the contaminant concentration. Typically, two modules will treat a 7.6 m (25 ft) diameter sludge storage tank, while a large belt filter press room with several presses may require a dozen or more modules.

Operating installations at wastewater facilities in the United States include lift stations, belt filter press rooms and sludge holding tanks. Facilities providing full scale system data include; the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (MWRD), Denver, CO, San Jacinto River Authority, near Houston, TX, and the Three Rivers WWTP, Three Rivers, MI. Based on the full-scale performance data from the facilities presented, air-ionization has been demonstrated to be a reliable and cost-effective means of odor control. The system has a minimal footprint and low power requirements of 35 watts per module. The system has zero water usage and no chemical handling or storage. Both capital and operating costs were found to be less than other options such as wet scrubbers, activated carbon, and biological treatment.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2004-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more