BALANCING POINT SOURCE AND AGRICULTURAL CONTROLS IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN

Authors: Slawecki, Theodore A.D.; Bondelid, Timothy; Stoddard, Andrew

Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2004: Session 71 through Session 80 , pp. 10-16(7)

Publisher: Water Environment Federation

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

For the past thirty years or more, elevated levels of dissolved inorganic nitrogen delivered to the Gulf of Mexico by the Mississippi River have contributed to the seasonal occurrence of an extended hypoxic zone – an area where marine life is threatened by oxygen depletion. These elevated nitrogen levels are attributed to increased point and nonpoint sources, and to alterations in the landscape and river channel that promote delivery instead of uptake and sequestration. In this paper, we examine estimates of nitrogen loads in the Mississipi River Basin, look at some simplistic load reduction scenarios, and discuss the difficulties in balancing different controls to address hypoxia.

Load estimates are taken from the National Water Pollution Control Assessment Model (NWPCAM), a policy support tool being developed for EPA by Research Triangle Institute. NWPCAM combines point source discharge information from the Permit Compliance System database with nonpoint source loading models for urban and rural areas to provide end-of-pipe and edge-of-field source estimates for conventional pollutant loadings. Load estimates for current conditions and for hypothetical control scenarios (e.g. point source nitrogen limits, feedlot regulation) will be compared in order to suggest potential benefits.

Although point source and agricultural controls both have tangible benefits in load reductions, there is considerable debate as to whether one approach is more effective and efficient than the other. This uncertainty reflects both the difficulties inherent in the largescale analysis presented here and the realities of the regulatory climate. Point and agricultural sources and their controls are administered under different programs and authorities, and understanding and appreciation of the similarities and differences in these programs is vital to effective partnering between point source and nonpoint source stakeholders.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864704784132689

Publication date: January 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page